So here is, from worst to best, my ranking of all the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolutions. 10- Evolution I (1992-1994) 7- Evolution IV (1996-1998) Compared to the V and VI, this one doesn’t look
MITSUBISHI Lancer Evolution VII 2000-2003 pecs, photos, engines, years, launch date and history. autoevolution MITSUBISHI news: 1 FUEL ECONOMY (NEDC) CO2 Emissions:At over 100kph, acceleration tapers off as the motor struggles with the brick-like aerodynamics, but that doesn't seem to affect economy. Driven conservatively, it gets 9km/L in traffic and 16-18km/L on the highway ( 20km/L is possible at a steady 70kph, but that's a rather frustrating exercise).We can help you calculate and track your fuel economy. MPG Estimates from Others; 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 4 cyl, 2.0 L, Manual 6-spd Maximum speed: 250 km/h | 155.34 mph. 0-100 km/h: 6.1 sec, 0-60 mph: 5.8 sec. Fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100 km | 22 US mpg | 26 UK mpg | 9 km/l. Тo check out further technical specifications (like engine power, dimensions, weight, fuel consumption, etc.), please select one of the versions. EVO 7. 2023 - SUV. Power: 174 Hp | Dimensions: 4795 x 1870 x 1758 mm. 2011 GG EVO X, SSL, Aero, Sunroof 117K miles 2.2L Stroked and sleeved- Wiseco 10:1- Carrillo Pro H Beam Rods- GSC S2- ID1700- Walbaro 525LPH- Radium -8an Fuel Feed and Filter-Cosworth Rail- Aeromotive FPR- Driven Fab T4 EFR 8474 EWG Turbo Kit- MAP test pipe- HKS Hi Power CBE- OS Giken Twin Clutch- MAP CMC Recommended fuel. City consumption. Highway economy. Combined cycle. 1.3 12V. Petrol (Gasoline) 26.1 mpg (USA) 9 l/100 km. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution Viii 2.0 MR FQ-400 4dr. Dimensions. Length 4,490mm Height 1,450mm Seats 5 Doors 4 Fuel Tank Capacity 55l Fuel type Petrol Transmission Manual Engine Capacity 1,997cc What is the average MPG (fuel economy) of a Mitsubishi ? Mitsubishi average fuel consumption is 38.1 MPG or 8.1 litres/100km and average CO2 output is 198.4 g/km based on 1035 models. CO2 (carbon dioxide), mileage, fuel economy and other emissions data for Mitsubishi cars. The most accurate 2012 Mitsubishi Lancers MPG estimates based on real world results of 1.0 million miles driven in 45 Mitsubishi way to track fuel consumption Well this FQ-300 is quicker, sharper, more refined, suffers less turbo lag and has more adjustable handling than the STi. Sadly it’s pricier, guzzles more super unleaded and needs servicing more